I started tcpdump on packetfence to filter for traffic to my Ruckus controller. tcpdump didn’t catch any traffic between PacketFence and the Ruckus Controller. There was no signal from PacketFence to Ruckus to indicate that the computer is authorized. PacketFence didn’t even try to communicate.
Is the hotspot feature of PacketFence broken in in 8.1? From: Caique Araujo via PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 4:20 AM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Caique Araujo <caiquearauj...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal authorization Ruckus Interface logging Friend, I have this same problem ... If I can identify I help you, if you can, could you help me too? Em ter, 18 de dez de 2018 às 00:20, Eric Rolleman via PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> escreveu: I followed the directions here: https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Network_Devices_Configuration_Guide.html#_ruckus_smartzone It seems the instructions are missing something as I can’t get this to work. If I type in the address manually after connecting to the wireless network I get the following message (: [cid:image001.png@01D496DC.E8AC1430] The instructions tell me to type in a URL that is not supported… From: Eric Rolleman via PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 5:07 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Eric Rolleman <eric.rolle...@cmsd.bc.ca<mailto:eric.rolle...@cmsd.bc.ca>> Subject: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal authorization Ruckus Interface logging Is there a log anywhere that I can look at to find out why clients aren’t getting authorized? I found the following dir: “ /usr/local/pf/logs “, but none of the logs appear to contain any data on why the my Ruckus Controller isn’t authorizing the client. Or if my configuration for the Web Services communication is correct. _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users -- Atenciosamente, Caique Araujo
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
