Hello Lindsay,
can you send the file /usr/local/pf/var/conf/iptables.conf and the
result of the command "ip route"
Thanks
Regards
Fabrice
Le 19-01-14 à 10 h 03, Lindsay, Ross M via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Greetings, All!
We’re working on a pilot of PacketFence to replace a home-grown
captive portal for two of the networks on our campus. Until we can
migrate to VLAN enforcement, these two specific networks will be
routed with PacketFence inline. There’s no NAT here – we’re using
public address space. I believe we have everything configured
properly, but traffic will not pass from a registered host on the
inline network out to the internet. I’ve verified that the routing
configuration (at the OS level, outside of PF) is correct – the
devices behind PF can pass traffic just fine if I flush the iptables
rules added by PF. I’ve also verified that the inline interface is not
set to NAT in the web GUI. Is there anything else specific that I
should check or that needs to be changed for this to work? We’re
running 8.3.0 on CentOS 7 if that helps.
Thank you!
--Ross
*Ross Lindsay* | /Systems/IT Architect Senior/
Office of Information Technology - Network Engineering
*Georgia*Institute of *Tech*nology
Phone: (404) 385-7520 <tel:4043857520> | Skype: [email protected]
<sip:[email protected]>
Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
--
Fabrice Durand
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
