Hi,

Hm..I don't think so.. I'm running pf on PC with 12 GB of memory..and pf
needs 8 GB right?
Any other suggestions?

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 2:37 AM Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
[email protected]> wrote:

> You don't have enough memory on your server.
>
>
> Le 19-08-01 à 09 h 17, Zairy Fajar via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>
> Yes I have it, if I use the account to do a remote wmi on Windows pc, it
> works..but packetfence cannot trigger any scan on Captive Portal .. also
> when I do wmic manually from the Packetfence server, it shows "Memory
> allocation error"..
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 8:09 PM Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Zairy,
>>
>> you need to have an account that able to connect to wmi on the remote
>> laptop, so it's probably a local account.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>> Le 19-07-31 à 23 h 24, Zairy Fajar via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>
>> Ok i understand, but how do I configure WMI scan engine to scan only one
>> host which is not in the AD domain? ( It's only in the default WORKGROUP)
>> I can't get the scan to work, the packetfence.log doesn't show anything
>> about scan
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, 7:58 PM Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> It depend how you configure your violation.
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 19-07-18 à 05 h 33, Chadwick Boseman via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Fabrice,
>>> Thanks a lot for ur answer, really helpful!
>>>
>>> One more thing I wanna ask is, if I do as you said
>>>
>>> *"You need to create a wmi scan engine and add it in the connection
>>> profile."*
>>>
>>> When the client device triggers a violation, will it be automatically
>>> moved to the isolation VLAN
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:16 PM Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Chadwick,
>>>> Le 19-07-16 à 04 h 59, Chadwick Boseman via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> So I have a PF Zen up and running,
>>>>
>>>> I have some questions regarding my understanding of VLAN membership in
>>>> PF:
>>>> 1. When a new device (never connect / never register before) is
>>>> connected to the switch, it will be put into the registration VLAN. And
>>>> after they register their device from the captive portal it will be moved
>>>> to guest VLAN automatically. Is this correct?? if not, please explain to me
>>>>
>>>> In fact the vlan you want.
>>>>
>>>> 2.  after the device's MAC is registered in the PF server, does the
>>>> user have to manually enable the 802.1x auth from their ethernet adapter?
>>>> or can PF actually automatically change the VLAN to default/normal VLAN and
>>>> activate the 802.1x auth?
>>>>
>>>> The supplicant needs to be configured if you wants to do 802.1x, you
>>>> can do it by GPO if you have a domain.
>>>>
>>>> Also you can do provisioning with packetfence but only for wireless
>>>> right now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i followed the pf installation guide , the captive portal is configured
>>>> to the bare minimum where the user just need to agree to some policy, and
>>>> the device then registered. My VLANs are as follow :
>>>> Guest                :  VLAN 640
>>>> Registration     :  VLAN 640
>>>> Normal/default : VLAN 625
>>>> Isolation            : VLAN 641
>>>>
>>>> The guest and registration VLANs are the same because the installation
>>>> guide said
>>>> *"in Role by VLAN ID, set the registration and guest VLAN ID to 20 -
>>>> this will ensure unregistered clients are initially put in VLAN 20 and
>>>> avoid a VLAN change once they properly authenticate from the captive
>>>> portal"*
>>>>
>>>> *It's for web authentication, not for vlan enforcement, so the
>>>> registration vlan needs to be different than the guest vlan.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I want something more to do on the captive portal, so I configured a
>>>> WMI scan so when a client register their device on the captive portal, WMI
>>>> checks whether they have an Antivirus installed or not..
>>>> I want that if the device doesn't have an AV installed, it is moved to
>>>> the isolation VLAN (That's the correct behavior right?) so how do I achieve
>>>> this?
>>>>
>>>> You need to create a wmi scan engine and add it in the connection
>>>> profile.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Fabrice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot guys..I'll really appreciate any explanation/answer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabrice [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabrice [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>> www.inverse.ca
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>> --
>> Fabrice [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>> www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> --
> Fabrice [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to