Hello Domingos,
really sorry for the delay.
So yes the registration and isolation vlan need to be available in all
your switches like a normal vlan. (layer 2)
The only difference is that this vlan is managed by packetfence, so pf
is the dhcp/dns/default gateway.
So let's say the reg vlan is 123 then you don't have to set a gateway on
this vlan.
Now let's say you want to route the registration vlan and isolation vlan.
You have 2 ways to do it, the first one is to have a gateway in the vlan
123 and tell packetfence to use this gateway to reach the remote
registration vlan and in the client gateway (on the other side) you need
to set an ip-helper address to the registration interface ip of packetfence.
Or you can use the management interface as a dhcp, to do that just add
an additional daemon to the management interface (dhcp) and create a
remote registration config that use the gateway facing the management
interface.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 19-08-09 à 12 h 03, Domingos Varela a écrit :
Hi Fabrice,
I agree with you that it is a network problem, because the production
network does not have access to the registration network.
Should registration and isolation networks be routed or not in the
infrastructure?
If not, how do clients get to the dhcp server if they don't have
access to the gateway of these networks?
Is it possible to change the dhcp listen port to the management address?
Thanks
Regards
A quarta, 7/08/2019, 16:44, Domingos Varela <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
Hi,
Pf logs in attach
Thanks
pf-logs.7z
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4kerdl39UHXZmlsckVnclFfaVIxNGhPdFV6MlZENWFyYkdR/view?usp=drivesdk>
A quarta, 7/08/2019, 15:41, Fabrice Durand <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
Hello Domingas,
the packetfence.log should be enough.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 19-08-06 à 17 h 01, Domingos Varela a écrit :
Hi Patrice,
Which equipment do you want the logs from?
For more details I send the implementation diagram.
Thanks
Regards
Cumprimentos,*
Domingos Varela*
Tel. +244 923 229 330 | Luanda - Angola
Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu no
dia terça, 6/08/2019 à(s) 20:27:
Hello Domingos,
if the device receive an ip address from the production
vlan then it mean that there is a network miss-configuration.
Can you provide some logs ?
Regards
Fabrice
Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via
PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi,
I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network,
but when a user connects to the network he gets the IP
from the data network and not from the registration
network.
Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration
network and after logging in receive the io from the
data network?
Thanks
Regards
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
--
Fabrice Durand
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> :: +1.514.447.4918
(x135) ::www.inverse.ca <http://www.inverse.ca>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and
PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
--
Fabrice Durand
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135)
::www.inverse.ca <http://www.inverse.ca>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and
PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
--
Fabrice Durand
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
