On 2012-04-05 15:54:17 (+0200), Christian <ch...@computersalat.de> wrote: > Am 05.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega: > >On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser<pascal.ble...@opensuse.org> wrote: > >>Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, > >>and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all > >>the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or > >>libxxx-for-older-than-11.4, etc... in Essentials). > >libmatroska-for-older-than-11.4, libebml-for-older-than-11.4, > >lash-for-sle and fluidsynth-for-sle were building against *every* > >version. I disabled the build to what I understood the name meant > >("older-than-11.4" includes both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?) and wiped the > >binaries.
> >Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2? > >Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2. > right. > I would prefer to remove SLE-11-SP2 > and would change SLE_11 to: > <repository name="SLE_11"> > <path repository="standard" project="openSUSE.org:SUSE:SLE-11:SP1"/> > <arch>x86_64</arch> > <arch>i586</arch> > </repository> Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with SP2 ? I mean, this compatibility thing is only half true: e.g. SP2 ships with Qt >= 4.8, while "SP0" doesn't. I wouldn't mind, less distros to build against means less pain, and dropping old ones even more so. cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green _\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf
pgp9gV083sfKQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman