On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, > > and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all > > the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or > > libxxx-for-older-than-11.4, etc... in Essentials).
> libmatroska-for-older-than-11.4, libebml-for-older-than-11.4,
> lash-for-sle and fluidsynth-for-sle were building against *every*
> version. I disabled the build to what I understood the name meant
> ("older-than-11.4" includes both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?) and wiped the
> binaries.
Yeah, I wrongly assumed that the meta in the branch would also
be transferred through SRs, but they don't.
Forgot to check and disable the in Essentials as well, thanks.
> Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?
> Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2.
Does it? I mean, really? SLE-11-SP2 ships different libs and
different versions of libs so ...
--
-o) Pascal Bleser
/\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green
_\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf
pgpZj2qfZK2Ey.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
