On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega <reddw...@opensuse.org> 
wrote:
> On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser <pascal.ble...@opensuse.org> wrote:
> > Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
> > and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
> > the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or
> > libxxx-for-older-than-11.4, etc... in Essentials).

> libmatroska-for-older-than-11.4, libebml-for-older-than-11.4,
> lash-for-sle and fluidsynth-for-sle were building against *every*
> version. I disabled the build to what I understood the name meant
> ("older-than-11.4" includes both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?) and wiped the
> binaries.

Yeah, I wrongly assumed that the meta in the branch would also
be transferred through SRs, but they don't.
Forgot to check and disable the in Essentials as well, thanks.

> Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?
> Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2.

Does it? I mean, really? SLE-11-SP2 ships different libs and
different versions of libs so ...

-- 
  -o) Pascal Bleser
  /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green
 _\_v http://fosdem.org   -- we haz conf

Attachment: pgpZj2qfZK2Ey.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Antwort per Email an