On 2012-04-19 01:01:40 (+0200), Philipp Seiler <p.sei...@linuxmail.org> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:28 +0200 > Manfred Tremmel <manf...@links2linux.de> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 17:49:46 schrieb Pascal Bleser: > > > I did a quick set up of an instance of JIRA and one of Bugzilla: > > > - Bugzilla: http://pmbs.links2linux.org:9999/ > > > - JIRA: http://pmbs.links2linux.org:8888/ > > I don't dislike JIRA, but a proprietary system for a free and open > > system like openSUSE is a total no-go for me. > /signed > And with bugzilla we're closer to the SUSE maintainance process. Which means... what ? That we have the same workflow for issues for Packman than for SUSE maintenance ? How is that relevant in any way ? (and we can have the same in JIRA, btw) Or that we have the same ugly and overly complex user interface as the bugzilla at Novell ? (actually we won't because we won't have the dozen additional custom fields and extensions that the Novell bugzilla has) If you believe the Novell/SUSE bugzilla is a cool thing, please look at the ton of threads and complaints about it over the years on the opensuse lists. Our needs are quite simple, we don't need complex workflows, we don't need a lot of fields nor customization, which also means that bugzilla still qualifies as an option. Ultimately, I personally believe the distinguishing factor should probably be user-friendliness: * how easy is it to register an account * how easy and clear is the user interface to perform common actions IMHO, JIRA is better on those points, but maybe that's just me :) [...] > > My vote, bugzilla. > My vote, bugzilla. cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green _\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf
pgp1DtScMWUsu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
