On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: >> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: >> >> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from? Shouldn't >> >> > I just link in the X11:common:Factory versions of redland AND >> >> > redland-bindings into Tumbleweed, instead of using the version of >> >> > redland from KDE-4.8? >> >> >> >> Sure. >> > >> > Now done. >> >> No, you didn't. >> >> $ osc cat -u openSUSE:Tumbleweed redland _link >> <link package="redland" project="KDE:Release:48" >> rev="f6ced863225677c1d17fbf3e4f05dcf3"> > > $ ./check_package X11:common:Factory/redland > # redland is up to date.
They are up to date. And I'm going to delete the package from Packman since that fixes the problem. But that doesn't mean you are linking Tumbleweed's redland to X11:common:Factory as you said you did. If you have any good reason to link to KDE:Release:48 and that wasn't just a mistake great, I am not discussing that decision. Just informing. _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
