On 25 July 2012 16:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: >> On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: >> >> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: >> >> >> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from? >> >> >> > Shouldn't >> >> >> > I just link in the X11:common:Factory versions of redland AND >> >> >> > redland-bindings into Tumbleweed, instead of using the version of >> >> >> > redland from KDE-4.8? >> >> >> >> >> >> Sure. >> >> > >> >> > Now done. >> >> >> >> No, you didn't. >> >> >> >> $ osc cat -u openSUSE:Tumbleweed redland _link >> >> <link package="redland" project="KDE:Release:48" >> >> rev="f6ced863225677c1d17fbf3e4f05dcf3"> >> > >> > $ ./check_package X11:common:Factory/redland >> > # redland is up to date. >> >> They are up to date. And I'm going to delete the package from Packman >> since that fixes the problem. But that doesn't mean you are linking >> Tumbleweed's redland to X11:common:Factory as you said you did. > > Well, my scripts, as shown above, sure think that it is linked properly :) > >> If you have any good reason to link to KDE:Release:48 and that wasn't >> just a mistake great, I am not discussing that decision. Just >> informing. > > That's because it is the same exact package: > > $ osc cat -u KDE:Release:48 redland _link > <link package="redland" project="KDE:Distro:Factory" rev="1" vrev="1"> > <patches> > > > > > </patches> > </link> > $ osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland _link > <link project="X11:common:Factory" baserev="3f8fba80afab3f422aba84faaa247f71"> > <patches> > <branch/> > </patches> > </link> > > So we are linking in the correct package into openSUSE:Tumbleweed, it just so > happens that is the same package that is in KDE:Release:48 at the moment. > > So all is well, right?
Yes. Really, I just told you in case you though you were directly linking to X11:common:Factory. If you know you aren't and are happy with that I don't see any problem. I don't know if your scripts will help you detect problems if at some point KDE:Release:48/redland starts to be different from X11:common:Factory/redland, but that's up to you to handle. But just in case your scripts depend on the output of those commands: - KDE:Release:48 is linking to a specific revision of KDE:Distro:Factory, when you do "osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland _link" you are looking at the latest one. - The output of "osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland _link" only says the package was branched from X11:common:Factory at some specific revision. It doesn't say if there are any differences between the version in KDE:Distro:Factory and the version in X11:common:Factory. So those commands don't shown the packages are exactly the same. But since in this case they actually are the same, no problem. _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
