Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>>  But ok, that explains it. It might be that this error.h just stayed
>>  there on my other box.
>>     
> No, Linux or gcc 4.3 apparently doesn't blow up on a missing header
> file. I don't have it here and everything compiled fine.
>
> -Dan
>
>   

It will definitely blow up on missing header.  It just searches default 
include paths first.  There is a /usr/include/error.h in glibc that you 
are pulling in.



_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev

Reply via email to