On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Looks like that snuck in from the way-old patch (take a look a the > > date). We used to have an error.h that contained not much of anything; > > that was removed in commit 4c872594da321aa406cfb306c32c94ce2929d59e > > and I obviously missed the bus on this. > > > > The patch is trival- remove it. > > > > How can I see the date? :) Because this was already pushed? Take a look at the author date. http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=13f24a5bdabf9c2c7bfa07aff7176495bb775a0d
> But ok, that explains it. It might be that this error.h just stayed > there on my other box. No, Linux or gcc 4.3 apparently doesn't blow up on a missing header file. I don't have it here and everything compiled fine. -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
