On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I see a downside in the proposed scheme: you can not create a package >> without the $pkgname- suffix, e.g. you can't create the "kopete" or >> "kmail" package from "kdenetwork". Moreover, you can't change the >> pkgdesc for each sub-package, which can be useful. > > makepkg may use subpackages as a new package name > > subpackages=(foo-dev foo-doc kmail kopete)
Exactly what I was going to say - it's all hypothetical. We could use $pkgdir/full-package-name/* for a subpackage "full-package-name" _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
