Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Sergej Pupykin<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I see a downside in the proposed scheme: you can not create a package >>> without the $pkgname- suffix, e.g. you can't create the "kopete" or >>> "kmail" package from "kdenetwork". Moreover, you can't change the >>> pkgdesc for each sub-package, which can be useful. >> makepkg may use subpackages as a new package name >> >> subpackages=(foo-dev foo-doc kmail kopete) > > Exactly what I was going to say - it's all hypothetical. We could use > $pkgdir/full-package-name/* for a subpackage "full-package-name" >
Does that answer the second concern about pkgdesc? There are several other variables that could change as well (backup, group, etc) _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
