On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> See: http://repo.or.cz/w/pacman-ng.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/working >> >> This is a big behavior change (iirc it restores the old behavior). Opinions? >> > > This is fine for me. But that means we consider bug 7884 as invalid, > which was opened by Dan. So as I said in the last comment of that bug, > we have to wait for his input :)
Damn, this is a huge code cleanup. I like it. I've pulled it into my working branch (the latest version). One thing I noticed and/or thought of- should we make the return status of this command different depending on whether there are upgrades available? That would make this super-easy to wrap in some sort of "up2date" script or something rather than having to parse the output. -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
