> Hmm, this isn't quite what I expected either. Can we clean up this > garbage in any way? > > $ ./src/pacman/pacman -Qu > warning: alsa-lib: local (1.0.17a-2) is newer than extra (1.0.17a-1) > warning: gvim: local (7.2.25-1) is newer than extra (7.1.330-1) > warning: namcap: local (2.1-2) is newer than extra (2.1-1) > warning: openoffice-base: local (3.0.0-3) is newer than extra > (3.0.0-2) warning: pacman-git: local (20081031-1) is newer than > pacman-git-64 (20081028-1) warning: pycairo: local (1.6.4-2) is newer > than extra (1.6.4-1) warning: pygobject: local (2.15.4-2) is newer > than extra (2.15.4-1) warning: pygtk: local (2.13.0-2) is newer than > extra (2.13.0-1) warning: python: local (2.6-2) is newer than extra > (2.5.2-5) warning: python-numeric: local (24.2-3) is newer than extra > (24.2-2) warning: sonata: local (1.5.3-2) is newer than extra > (1.5.3-1) warning: vi: local (7.2.25-1) is newer than core (7.1.330-1) > warning: vim: local (7.2.25-1) is newer than extra (7.1.330-1) > warning: vte: local (0.17.4-2) is newer than extra (0.17.4-1) > > -Dan
1. Since I am lazy, I first try with the easiest solution. What about completely removing these messages? Are these useful with -Su at all? (The old -Qu printed these messages as well, bacause it was a simulation of -Su). 2. We could disable all warnings like with -Sp. 3. Most complicated: Give a new parameter to sync_newversion. This could fix the possible duplicated "pacman is newer than extra" message on -Su. Which solution do you prefer? _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
