On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote: > Allan McRae wrote: >> >> Xyne wrote: >>>> >>>> Cool.... but something is slightly wrong there: >>>> >>>> libburn - optional for: >>>> brasero: alternative back-end >>>> bzip2: alternative back-end >>>> >>>> bzip2 probably does not have a libbrun backend :) >>>> >>>> Allan >>>> >>> >>> I don't know how that happened (haven't been able to reproduce the >>> error here). I did find some other bugs though so maybe that one was >>> fixed indirectly. I've attached a new version. If it still lies, send >>> me the output of "pacman -Qi". >>> >> >> Works fine now. Thanks. > > As an aside, what this has made me realize is that the style of optdepends > specification varies a bit within the packages our repos (some do not even > use ":"'s to separate the package name from the description). If they are > going to become more than informational, this needs to become more > standardized. Maybe makepkg needs to add a check on the style.
Apparently my "similar to the following" text in man PKGBUILD was not enough. :( I'd be fine with a check added to makepkg, although I never wanted to get draconian about it (and I never meant for it to become machine-parseable, but it seems I am in the minority there). -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
