Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Cool.... but something is slightly wrong there:
libburn - optional for:
brasero: alternative back-end
bzip2: alternative back-end
bzip2 probably does not have a libbrun backend :)
Allan
I don't know how that happened (haven't been able to reproduce the
error here). I did find some other bugs though so maybe that one was
fixed indirectly. I've attached a new version. If it still lies, send
me the output of "pacman -Qi".
Works fine now. Thanks.
As an aside, what this has made me realize is that the style of optdepends
specification varies a bit within the packages our repos (some do not even
use ":"'s to separate the package name from the description). If they are
going to become more than informational, this needs to become more
standardized. Maybe makepkg needs to add a check on the style.
Apparently my "similar to the following" text in man PKGBUILD was not enough. :(
I'd be fine with a check added to makepkg, although I never wanted to
get draconian about it (and I never meant for it to become
machine-parseable, but it seems I am in the minority there).
I know, but now they are there, it is just too tempting to leave them
alone...
I added a bug report so this does not get forgotten:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15125
Allan
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
