> This prints an error, but does not actually bail, on failure of
> asprintf. This is an improvement over the current code as we would
> know where the error occurred, but feels wrong not to exit. Note
> that several of the functions affected return void, so erroring out
> is not a simple "return -1".
>
I don't know any C so sorry If that sounds stupid.
Wouldn't creating an errfunc works here?
#sudo code:
int errfunc(void) {
return -1 ;
}
void somefunc(void) {
errfunc() ;
}
int main(void) {
somefunc() ;
}
> So, any ideas on the best way to approach this?
>
> Allan
>
