On 06/10/10 08:52, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote:
On 06/10/10 08:37, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Dan McGee<[email protected]> wrote:
And looking closer at my numbers, did we not lose time here? If you
through the read() calls out (which I left in only because that was
the top time user), I should do some new timings or someone else
should as well...
Slower it is! Non-truncated test output below after two warm up runs of
each.
I just replicated the same result. It is even worse if you drop all caches
before running the strace.
Off to the trash bin for this patch then? Performance improvements
that don't really improve performance are kind of a downer, unless
someone shows me results on OS X or Cygwin that this is a huge win and
worth keeping around.
Agreed.
