On Friday, February 25, 2011, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/02/11 00:29, Dave Reisner wrote: > > > The ensuing patches revert Allan's breakage^Wchanges to the public API with > regard to the introduction of pmpkghash_t. Since we haven't exposed any public > facing API calls which can manipulate a pmpkghash_t <snip> > > > Yet... There are several places in pacman where the exposing (e.g.) > _alpm_pkghash_find() would be very useful so I think this is likely to be > exposed in the future.
You can blame this on me, Allan. I suggested we do this because we have caused headaches to people with the unnecessary rename. Exposing it later via a _hash suffix might happen, but no need to expose it until we know it is needed. -Dan
