On 26/02/11 01:06, Dan McGee wrote:
On Friday, February 25, 2011, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote:
On 26/02/11 00:29, Dave Reisner wrote:
The ensuing patches revert Allan's breakage^Wchanges to the public API with
regard to the introduction of pmpkghash_t. Since we haven't exposed any public
facing API calls which can manipulate a pmpkghash_t<snip>
Yet... There are several places in pacman where the exposing (e.g.)
_alpm_pkghash_find() would be very useful so I think this is likely to be
exposed in the future.
You can blame this on me, Allan. I suggested we do this because we
have caused headaches to people with the unnecessary rename. Exposing
it later via a _hash suffix might happen, but no need to expose it
until we know it is needed.
OK. Ack both patches then.
Allan
