On 14-02-05 09:18:48, Andrew Gregory wrote: > On 02/04/14 at 12:16am, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > Package are processed in the same order as pacman output, so there is no > > real > > need to sort, we can print directly. This makes the code simpler and faster. > > > > The only difference is that local packages will always be printed at the > > end. Previously, they were printed before multilib for instance. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> > > --- > > contrib/pacsearch.in | 46 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------ > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > This adds an 8 second delay between sync and local results for me on > a cold run. It's not a deal-breaker for me, but I'd prefer to remove > the sort by just storing the results in a list.
How is the overall runtime? Your alternative sounds OK to me, but why is it so important to have everything printed in one run? -- Pierre Neidhardt You're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.
