On 06/02/14 01:16, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > On 14-02-05 09:18:48, Andrew Gregory wrote: >> On 02/04/14 at 12:16am, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: >>> Package are processed in the same order as pacman output, so there is no >>> real >>> need to sort, we can print directly. This makes the code simpler and faster. >>> >>> The only difference is that local packages will always be printed at the >>> end. Previously, they were printed before multilib for instance. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> contrib/pacsearch.in | 46 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------ >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> >> This adds an 8 second delay between sync and local results for me on >> a cold run. It's not a deal-breaker for me, but I'd prefer to remove >> the sort by just storing the results in a list. > > How is the overall runtime? > > Your alternative sounds OK to me, but why is it so important to have > everything > printed in one run? >
It is bad to have software freeze in the middle of output. The user has no indication what happened. Allan
