On 14-03-05 10:50:30, Dave Reisner wrote:
> Ok, I'll bite. Why aren't we working on merging expac (or something like
> expac)? Adding yet another tool tool which relies on parsing unstable
> output from pacman seems like a step in the wrong direction.
I know it's not the place to report this, but talking about it, expac is under
MIT license, while the package in the repo is marked as GPL. Anyhow, what is
pacman's policy on merging third-party software with non-GPL license?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
The Kennedy Constant:
Don't get mad -- get even.
