On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:38:57PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > On 14-03-05 10:50:30, Dave Reisner wrote: > > Ok, I'll bite. Why aren't we working on merging expac (or something like > > expac)? Adding yet another tool tool which relies on parsing unstable > > output from pacman seems like a step in the wrong direction. > > I know it's not the place to report this, but talking about it, expac is under > MIT license, while the package in the repo is marked as GPL. Anyhow, what is > pacman's policy on merging third-party software with non-GPL license?
Poof. As the sole author, I allow it to be licensed under $insert_any_license_compatible_with_gpl. MIT is totally compatible with GPL, btw....
