On 25. 3. 2015 6:13, Allan McRae wrote: >> I've thought about it, and I like more the version that defers deleting >> $pkgdir's until it is really needed. Clearing all $pkgdir's at once would >> produce different results in case a failure occurs before all packaging >> function are called. >> > > If packaging files, you could end up with two $pkgdir from the new > package (one broken) and one from the old package - I do not like that > inconsistency. Why would you want to keep the old package $pkgdir if > you are intending to replace it?
Hmm. You're right -- if some $pkgdir is important to me, running makepkg that needs to overwrite it would be silly. Shall I make patch v2? -- David Macek
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
