On 25/03/15 18:09, David Macek wrote: > On 25. 3. 2015 6:13, Allan McRae wrote: >>> I've thought about it, and I like more the version that defers deleting >>> $pkgdir's until it is really needed. Clearing all $pkgdir's at once would >>> produce different results in case a failure occurs before all packaging >>> function are called. >>> >> >> If packaging files, you could end up with two $pkgdir from the new >> package (one broken) and one from the old package - I do not like that >> inconsistency. Why would you want to keep the old package $pkgdir if >> you are intending to replace it? > > Hmm. You're right -- if some $pkgdir is important to me, running makepkg that > needs to overwrite it would be silly. > > Shall I make patch v2? >
That would be great thanks! A
