Still better to keep them separate.
On 18 February 2011 01:41, Zeno Gantner <zeno.gant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Sebastian Willing >> <sebastian.will...@web.de> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> many people suggested that new features should go into one plugin per >>> feature until they're moved to core. >>> >>> Do we want a new Plugin project for each of them in trunk/ or shall we >>> use a common Padre-Plugin-Experimental directory in trunk/ where all >>> (small) experimental plugins are found as one project? >> >> IMHO keep them in trunk if you really don't want to create several >> plugins for different >> features you can always put them in one. Worst case you'll need to >> split them later. > > I guess what Sewi meant was that we can use the same directory for > different plug-ins, so users can activate whatever they want, but do > not need to use the experimental features they do not want. > > Best regards, > Z. > -- > MyMediaLite Recommender System Library: http://ismll.de/mymedialite > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > Padre-dev@perlide.org > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
