Hi, anyway - what do we get?
I don't think that a defined-or-operator is enough for requiering 5.10, but if Scintilla has to be prepared for each version seperatly, this would be a reason for 5.10. Do all of our dependencies run on 5.8? We might have that 5.10 requirement already in some downstream module. Sebastian Am 09.03.2011 11:17, schrieb Gabor Szabo: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Zeno Gantner<zeno.gant...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Gabor: >>> An the third issue, do Debian/Fedora/Mandriva already >>> have 5.10 at least or will they be stuck in an older version of Padre? >>> IMHO that would not be a good idea so probably we should >>> stick to the version of perl (or older) where our major downstream >>> distributors are. >> >> for the last two versions each (does only include stable releases), >> and the release date of the older version: >> >> Debian: 5.10.1 / 5.10.1, 02/2009 >> Fedora: 5.12.2 / 5.10.1 05/2010 >> Mandriva: 5.10.1 / 5.10.1 07/2010 >> Ubuntu: 5.10.1 / 5.10.1 04/2010 >> Open SuSE: 5.12.1 / 5.10.1 11/2009 >> RHEL: 5.10.1 / 5.8.8 01/2011 >> >> Sources: >> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=debian >> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora >> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=mandriva >> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ubuntu >> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=suse >> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=redhat >> > > actually: > https://www.socialtext.net/perl5/versions > > > Gabor > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > Padre-dev@perlide.org > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
