My hope is that the Padre and PDL integration could be
a nice alternative to Matlab. So anything that gets us closer
to that would be great.
If you are not familiar with Matlab (as I am not :) you can check
out some videos on YouTube showing it:
eg. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPLBPdux6bs

Gabor

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Ahmad Zawawi <ahmad.zaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know this is a somewhat late response. I am not totally familiar
> with PDL. What kind of support do we need for PDL in Padre (e.g.
> Padre::Plugin::PDL).
>
> Could you explain what needs to be done?
> - PDL keywords highlighting
> - Padre help integration
> - Snippets?
> - Run PDL scripts?
> - Debug PDL scripts?
> - Syntax check PDL scripts?
> - Show in Outline PDL elements.
>
> P.S. I am willing to allocate FuN time on this one if i can understand
> what needs to be done first :)
>
> Regards,
> Ahmad M. Zawawi
>
> 2012/2/6 chm <devel.chm...@gmail.com>:
>> Hey Gabor-
>>
>> We've just released PDL-2.4.10 along with the
>> first draft of the PDL Book.  PDL seems to be
>> getting close to being a fully portable release
>> across all major perl platforms: windows,
>> unix-en, and macosx.
>>
>> I've seen some recent announcements that Padre
>> may be starting to stabilize with a 1.0 release.
>>
>> If that is the case, maybe it would be possible
>> to take another look at using Padre with PDL in
>> the coming year.  With the rapid evolution of
>> Padre recently, it has not been possible to
>> investigate further as part of PDL development.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> On 2/6/2012 2:48 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:03 PM, kmx<k...@atlas.cz>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Any reason why "Strawberry Perl 5.14 preview release" is not the
>>>>> default stable?
>>>>
>>>> http://strawberryperl.com/package/kmx/p5.14.2.1-RC/ was prepared (by me)
>>>> in release quality (well tested, digitally signed, many bugs fixed)
>>>>
>>>> Ask Alias why he did not uploaded these ZIPs/MSIs to proper place (where
>>>> I was not given an access) - note that the files are dated 22-Nov-2011,
>>>> which is the date when I have notified him (+ couple of times after that)
>>>
>>> Hmm, I thought it had some issues or that at least it was not signed.
>>>
>>> I'll try to ask Adam what's the problem and in the meantime I'll try
>>> to install Padre in it
>>> starting with the 32 bit msi file as I only have a 32 bit Windows.
>>>
>>> regards
>>>     Gabor
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to