Sound cools. Thanks for the link.
I did not learn MatLab while in the university... :( Oh well, I will
learn it now  :)
So command window + history + snippets + Run script + highlight +
syntax check = Padre::Plugin::PDL :)

2012/3/5 Gabor Szabo <ga...@szabgab.com>:
> My hope is that the Padre and PDL integration could be
> a nice alternative to Matlab. So anything that gets us closer
> to that would be great.
> If you are not familiar with Matlab (as I am not :) you can check
> out some videos on YouTube showing it:
> eg. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPLBPdux6bs
>
> Gabor
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Ahmad Zawawi <ahmad.zaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I know this is a somewhat late response. I am not totally familiar
>> with PDL. What kind of support do we need for PDL in Padre (e.g.
>> Padre::Plugin::PDL).
>>
>> Could you explain what needs to be done?
>> - PDL keywords highlighting
>> - Padre help integration
>> - Snippets?
>> - Run PDL scripts?
>> - Debug PDL scripts?
>> - Syntax check PDL scripts?
>> - Show in Outline PDL elements.
>>
>> P.S. I am willing to allocate FuN time on this one if i can understand
>> what needs to be done first :)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ahmad M. Zawawi
>>
>> 2012/2/6 chm <devel.chm...@gmail.com>:
>>> Hey Gabor-
>>>
>>> We've just released PDL-2.4.10 along with the
>>> first draft of the PDL Book.  PDL seems to be
>>> getting close to being a fully portable release
>>> across all major perl platforms: windows,
>>> unix-en, and macosx.
>>>
>>> I've seen some recent announcements that Padre
>>> may be starting to stabilize with a 1.0 release.
>>>
>>> If that is the case, maybe it would be possible
>>> to take another look at using Padre with PDL in
>>> the coming year.  With the rapid evolution of
>>> Padre recently, it has not been possible to
>>> investigate further as part of PDL development.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On 2/6/2012 2:48 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:03 PM, kmx<k...@atlas.cz>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Any reason why "Strawberry Perl 5.14 preview release" is not the
>>>>>> default stable?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://strawberryperl.com/package/kmx/p5.14.2.1-RC/ was prepared (by me)
>>>>> in release quality (well tested, digitally signed, many bugs fixed)
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask Alias why he did not uploaded these ZIPs/MSIs to proper place (where
>>>>> I was not given an access) - note that the files are dated 22-Nov-2011,
>>>>> which is the date when I have notified him (+ couple of times after that)
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, I thought it had some issues or that at least it was not signed.
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to ask Adam what's the problem and in the meantime I'll try
>>>> to install Padre in it
>>>> starting with the 32 bit msi file as I only have a 32 bit Windows.
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>     Gabor
> _______________________________________________
> Padre-dev mailing list
> Padre-dev@perlide.org
> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to