Dave, you are mysterious. How can we know if those other paths are better if you don't tell us which ones are those?
Anyway why not go to the download page of Padre and download it from there? Here: http://padre.perlide.org/download.html Gabor On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Dave Pearson <phoenix7...@att.net> wrote: > Hi guys ... > > Dave Pearson here. The original download path is: > > > http://padre-perl-ide.googlecode.com/files/padre-on-strawberry-5.12.3.0-v5.exe > > I've since found some other paths which may point to other options which > don't > contain a built-in perl installation. Should I use one of those? > > Thanks, > > ... Dave Pearson > > On 5/15/2012 8:28 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote: >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Dave Pearson<phoenix7...@att.net> wrote: >>> Hi guys ... >>> >>> Just to clarify - >>> >>> I'm on a Windows 7 (SP1) platform, running 64-bit windows. I originally >>> installed the >>> 64-bit version of perl (5.14.2), and it would only install under >>> C:/strawberry/... >>> I then discovered the current version of Padre (I believe it's 0.84), >>> which includes >>> perl 5.12.3 (apparently 32-bit). >>> >>> It appears that the command: >>> >>> perl -v >>> >>> exexuted from the cmd interface originally showed 5.14.2, but after >>> installing Padre, >>> it is now 5.12.3. I believe some things get reset in the registry when >>> Padre is installed; >>> there is no option to activate the later version of perl and not install >>> the earlier >>> version. >>> >>> I currently have Padre only (and 5.12.3). Any ideas how this can be made >>> to work >>> with 5.14.2? >>> >>> ... Dave Pearson >>> >> What do you mean "Padre contains Perl"? >> Could you show us the link where you downloaded that "Padre that >> contains perl 5.12.3"? >> >> >> Gabor _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
