Hi everyone, I have been following this discussion and +1 to everyone for the upcoming monthly Padre release :)
Ahmad 2013/2/3 Peter Lavender <pla...@internode.on.net> > No worries Kevin. :) > > We can change the Makefile.PL once it's branched. Post release I merge > back to trunk, so it would be fine from that point of view I think. > > Peter. > > > > On 3/02/2013 12:18 AM, kevin dawson wrote: > > On 02/02/13 03:42, Peter Lavender wrote: > > Given it is now into feb. I'm happy to make it post the 7th to fit in > with your schedule. > > I'm about right to go. I think I'll give it a couple more days and I'll > branch trunk. From there the translators can have a crack things. And > we should be right for a release some time after the 7th. > > Does that work ? > > Or are you after a post 7th release on trunk? > > > > > On 27/01/2013 8:04 PM, Sven Dowideit wrote: > > It seems I'll be demoing Padre to the local brisbane perlmongers group, > so I expect to be doing a little more work on the debugger changes I > made before then > > so for me, a post 7th Feb release would be pretty good :) > > Sven > > > On 27/01/13 14:19, Peter Lavender wrote: > > Hi Gabor, > > Yes, it's been a while now. Basically things slowed and I found > something else to take up all my spare time. > > I'm just going through the motions of setting up a system to do the > releases off. Should have it finished off in a few days. I'm not going > to spend all my time focused on this, it will have to share what time I > have. > > In saying that, I think an and of Jan release is not likely if left to > me. However it shouldn't be too much later. Either that or once I'm up > and running, we can work on finalising any issues outstanding for an end > of Feb release. > > Peter. > > > On 25/01/2013 8:22 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote: > > Hi, > > I know the development of Padre has significantly slowed down, > but there were quite some changes since the latest release on > April 23, 2012 and I think without releases to CPAN, > the development will never pick up again. > > I'd like to raise the idea of a new monthly release schedule > starting from January 2013. That leaves a week now to clean up > any last minute issues. > > I know the most recent release was 0.96, the next one is going to be > 0.98 and then the magic 1.00, but I think at this point it would be > more important to get the ball rolling again than to think about the > magic power of 1.00. > > So I'd just release 0.98 on 31 January and then 1.00 on 28 February > without attaching any special meaning to these numbers. > > What do you think? > > > Peter, could you handle the release again, please? > > regards > Gabor > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing > listPadre-dev@perlide.orghttp://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing > listPadre-dev@perlide.orghttp://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing > listPadre-dev@perlide.orghttp://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > > I have spent some more time on Debug::Client making it perl 5.17.8 > compatible, it works now. Also win32 issue highlighted by chorny. > > so peter when you just about to 'branch trunk', we will need to tweak the > Padre Makefile.PL also before release to new number. I will also release it > as Debug::Client 0.22. > > I have held back on releasing as it is not back compatible with Padre > 0.96, ok > > regards > kevin > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing > listPadre-dev@perlide.orghttp://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > Padre-dev@perlide.org > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
