On 10/02/13 09:24, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just looked at http://changes.cpanhq.org/dist/Padre that tells me
> the Changes file does not
> match the CPAN::Changes standard.
I concur
> As I can see we have our odd version numbers with the line
> Development version, not released
> instead of the date.
I agree a date would be nice addition
>
> I know the odd numbers are used during development, but I wonder why
> do we keep them
> in the changes file when we release Padre?
It's called a history trail, I think :)
>
> Wouldn't it be better to remove the odd lines and unite their content
> with the version
I am now confused :(
> where they were really released?
>
> 0.97 Development version, not released
> 0.95 Development version, not released
> 0.93 Development version, not released
> 0.91 Development version, not released
> 0.89 Development version, not released
> 0.87 Development version, not released
> 0.85 Development version, not released
> 0.83 Development version, not released
> 0.81 Development version, not released
> 0.79 Development version, not released
> 0.77 Development version, not released
> 0.75 Development version, not released
> 0.73 Development version, not released
> 0.71 Development version, not released
>
>
> Gabor
> _______________________________________________
> Padre-dev mailing list
> Padre-dev@perlide.org
> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
>
Should this not just be a feature enhancement ticket, to make our 
Changes file comply with -> https://metacpan.org/module/CPAN::Changes::Spec

just as

see - http://padre.perlide.org/trac/browser/trunk/Padre-Plugin-Git/Changes
also - http://changes.cpanhq.org/dist/Padre-Plugin-Git

do

regards
bowtie

_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to