I say do the most obvious ones and toss the rest at the point it becomes too much work.
It's more important that we get it moved over than we retain high fidelity. Adam On 22 August 2014 02:26, Claudio Ramirez <padre.clau...@apt-get.be> wrote: > Well, the ticket convertion project may work. But many of those tickets > will be historical weight and it will take a lot of effort to sort them > out. This gives more space to new tickets on github. I think a huge list of > "historical" tickets may discourage people of adding new ones. > > C. > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:59 AM, kevin dawson <ke...@dawson10.plus.com> > wrote: > >> On 22/08/14 09:45, Kaare Rasmussen wrote: >> >>> The tickets don't seem to contain info about which distro it belongs to. >>> They're all in one big pile. I think it will be a problem if they are to be >>> converted. >>> >> I have know idea if we can even convert the trac tickets and if so how we >> would do that, let alone identify with part of the padre eco system it >> applies to >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Padre-dev mailing list >> Padre-dev@perlide.org >> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > Padre-dev@perlide.org > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
