Re: [3.2] 'temp' db type ever to be implemented?

[Bob Ebert]

At 8:25 AM -0800 3/9/99, Scott Johnson wrote:
>This would even plug a sort of hole in the system -- currently you can't
>even call DmDeleteDatabase during a reset launch code because it screws
>up the launch code broadcast loop itself, causing a crash.  (At least it
>did for me in 3.0.)  So my wipeout code must call DmRemoveResource on
>all the individual records, which is bigger and slower.

I can't think of any reason why DmDeleteDatabase would crash during a reset
launch code loop.  Maybe you accidently tried to use some global variable?
I'd love to see the stack trace for this.

                                --Bob