Re: [3.2] 'temp' db type ever to be implemented?

[Alan Pinstein]

>I'd bet it would fail in the Find launch code the same way it fails in
>the Reset launch code, since the same basic logic is executing.

Err, uh.... good point. As for the rest of it, sounds like you've done all
you can as best you can. Palm? Any comments?


Alan Pinstein
Synergy Solutions, Inc.
http://www.synsolutions.com
1-800-210-5293