but it seems to me that that is what they are doing. they seem to have
at least two different versions of OS 3.1, one for the V and one for the
IIIx. i guess i am still confused why two machines that report the same
OS are in fact using different OS. it seems logical to me that one
would include the same system functions on both, and if a function isnt
used by a particular machine, then no big loss. but then again, i dont
know alot about what happens behind the scenes, so i could be missing
out on something. so, palm computing, am i missing something?
:P
Scott Johnson wrote:
> > anyone know why two copies of the same
> > OS have different functions?
>
> So our friends at Palm Computing don't go insane trying to manage dozens
> of almost-the-same-but-slightly-different OS builds? :-)
