Um ... I think this has been mentioned before, but
since the issue came up again: could you guys consider
being a little more rational with your patch naming?
I mean, shouldn't it be "Patch 1" and "Patch 2" rather
than "Patch 1" and "Patch 1 update"? What would be
next in that series? "Patch 1 update supplement"?
And then the "update supplement addendum"? It is easier
for us to keep track of what's what if the naming
conventions are clear.
Aside from that: I thought that I had heard about
some problems that had been caused by installing these
patches, so I have not done so so far. Are these
patches safe to install?
--
-Richard M. Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jun-Kiat Lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 11:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: More stupid questions...
>
>
> Hi Niel,
>
> Which projects did you download again? It would help if you
> could clarify
> which ones....in general the error would come when you opened
> a project
> created in a newer version of the IDE in an older version of
> the IDE. I
> would also hazard a guess that you don't have the patch
> installed, which
> also installs a newer IDE; and that the projects in question
> were created
> using this newer version of the IDE. You could try downloading and
> installing CW for Palm R5 Patch 1, followed by CW for Palm R5
> Patch 1 Update
> from http://208.226.102.11/updates.qry?function=search
> and try reopening the project to see if it works.
>
