One of our customers had speed problems with Sat Forms when querying
data. A lookup of last_name on 2,500 records took 10 minutes. We
converted their application to use UltraLite and the same query took 2
seconds.
It depends on what type of data manipulation/functionality your
application will require.
Using SF for prototypes was fast and effective.
David Fishburn
Mobile Embedded Computing Division
Sybase
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Church [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 8:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Development tool
>
>
>
>
> Our group develops in both Sat Forms and CodeWarrior. We find SF to
> be great for building small projects (in terms of number of users)
and
> in prototyping systems. For systems that primarily involve data
> gathering on the Palm, SF cannot be beat for putting together a
> proof-of-concept for a custom project.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Thuler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, July 22, 1999 6:13 PM
> Subject: Fw: Development tool
>
>
> >My team is currently developing programs using Code Warrior. We are
> trying
> >to
> >increase productivity. I've found some other tools : Pendragon
Forms,
> >Satellite Forms, CASL and Palm Factory. Does any one has some
advice
> on the
> >choice ?
> >
> >My concerns are: reduce development time, not to loose too much
> program
> >performance and being able to develop extensions in C++ when the
tool
> >presents some limitation.
> >
> >thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
