> >especially with a coding problem / question that is NOT new.
>
> The question is old, but part of the answer is new.
>
> This'll seem like a tempest in a teapot later; you'll understand the
> distinction I was trying to make, I think... but it isn't worth making a
> big deal about.
the VoidHand 'vs Handle situation technically speaking is a matter
of interpretation.. they act the same when being treated in their
pure form.. it is just when you want to use the component data type
that you require casting with the VoidHandle - the Handle is built
for managing memory address locations (bytes).
maybe i missed the question that required *new* answers.. i was
answering primarially the VoidHand vs Handle question.. not the othe
questions.. unless there is something i dont know about the PalmOS
relating to these two pointer handles - that was 100% answerable
without bringing anything new up.
:) no offense was intended.. i look forward to reading the proceedings
when i finally receive them. :)
cheers.
az.
--
Aaron Ardiri
Lecturer http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/
University-College i G�vle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SE 801 76 G�vle SWEDEN
Tel: +46 26 64 87 38 Fax: +46 26 64 87 88
Mob: +46 70 656 1143 A/H: +46 26 10 16 11
