Andres Linke writes:
>Bob Ebert wrote:
>> So, we're fixing this by creating a new type that accurately
>> represents a memory manager handle, [...]
>
> Please, please tell me that this will not break any existing code.
This change will not break any correct existing code.
> I'm
> really tired of "cleaning up" all my sources everytime I install a new
> version of the PalmOS SDK.
I Feel Your Pain.
John
- PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Andreas Linke
- Re: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... David Fedor
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... John Marshall
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Richard Hartman
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Bob Ebert
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Linke, Andreas Dr.
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Aaron Ardiri
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Bob Ebert
- Re: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... John Marshall
- Re: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Scott Johnson
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Linke, Andreas Dr.
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Richard Hartman
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handl... Bob Ebert
