> -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Ebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > The compatibility header is intended only to allow you to quickly get > ported over and add in the new features. We hope you take > the time to make > the conversion, because of the improved type checking, readability and > maintainability it offers. Will your compatibility headers have FooPtr ? If so, will it be by typedef or #define ? (Note that the results would not be the same...) -- -Richard M. Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
- Re: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) David Fedor
- Re: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) John Marshall
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Richard Hartman
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Bob Ebert
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Linke, Andreas Dr.
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Aaron Ardiri
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Bob Ebert
- Re: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) John Marshall
- Re: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Scott Johnson
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Linke, Andreas Dr.
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Richard Hartman
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Bob Ebert
- RE: PalmOS API change (Was: Re: VoidHand vs. Handle) Richard Hartman
