At 6:02 PM -0800 11/10/99, David Fedor wrote: >I just checked the sources from 3.5 back to 3.0 inclusive, and in every >case passing 0 is equal to passing MenuGetActiveMenu(), except passing 0 is >faster :-) "don't do what the source does", "the source will lie and mislead you", "use only the documented API's" :P Razzing aside, is passing 0 to MenuEraseStatus() something that is reasonably expected to continue to work? H
- MenuEraseStatus(0); McCollister, Mike
- Re: MenuEraseStatus(0); Aaron Ardiri
- Re: MenuEraseStatus(0); David Fedor
- Re: MenuEraseStatus(0); Hal Mueller
- Re: MenuEraseStatus(0); Aaron Ardiri
- Re: MenuEraseStatus(0); John Marshall
- RE: MenuEraseStatus(0); McCollister, Mike
- RE: MenuEraseStatus(0); Aaron Ardiri
- RE: MenuEraseStatus(0); David Fedor
