Steve Sabram wrote: > > I didn't want to bring up octal since there was enough confusion. Octal has > gone the wayside since a single hex digit can represent four bytes and two > hex digits conveniently represents a single byte. oops, you did it again! a single hex digit can represent four bits, not four bytes. :P
- Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary Data/Hexid... Steve Sabram
- Re: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... John Marshall
- RE: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... Greg Pasquariello
- Re: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... Steve Sabram
- Re: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... Mark Nudelman
- Re: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... Steve Sabram
- Re: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... pete moss
- Re: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... Steve Sabram
- RE: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary D... Eric Cloninger
