Re: Steve's Guide to Hexadecimal (was: Re: Binary Data/Hexidecimals)

[Steve Sabram]

pete moss wrote:

> Steve Sabram wrote:
> >
> > I didn't want to bring up octal since there was enough confusion.  Octal has
> > gone the wayside since a single hex digit can represent four bytes and two
> > hex digits conveniently represents a single byte.
>
> oops, you did it again!  a single hex digit can represent four bits, not
> four bytes.

Now I know I'm turning into executive material.  I'm already having other
engineers correct my lingo! :)

Remind me to hire you as a proofreader for me next PalmSource presentation.

>
>
> :P