Thanks to all who responded. Jun-Kiat Lam indicated that the problem was
thread/process related.  He suggested that other applications running or
that files residing on a compressed drive may be the culprit.  In my case
none of the files were compressed and closing all but Constructor did not
make a difference.  What I tried next was going into the NT Task Manager's
Processes tab and changing the thread priority of Constructor to "High",
before attempting to open the file.  That did the trick.  It may help Gaurav
Palvia who periodically can not save (that has got to be a much worse
feeling than not opening).  And to answer Richard Hartman, it did not matter
which method of opening the file I tried, it would always hang.

Regards,

Eric Martens

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Hartman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 1:37 PM
> To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:      RE: Constructor 1.2b4 hangs
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martens, Eric A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > 
> > I have installed CodeWarrior Lite on an NT machine running 
> > SP4.  When I try
> > to open an .rsrc file the task status becomes "not 
> > responding".  It creates
> > them and allows me to save them, but I can not open then again.
> > 
> > I installed CodeWarrior Lite on another NT machine running 
> > SP4  and resource
> > files open OK.  What should I look at on the machine that 
> > hangs when trying
> > to open a .rsrc file.  Are there any dlls that may not have 
> > gotten copied?
> > The system that is having the problem has MS Visual Studio 
> > loaded as well as
> > Synplicity's VHDL compiler (among other things).
> > 
> > Any suggestions on how to fix this problem would be greatly 
> > appreciated, as
> > I do not always have access to the machine that can open .rsrc files.
> > 
> 
> Does the open fail when trying to double-click on a .rsrc
> file, when trying to double-click on the .rsrc file in the
> project window, or when using file/open from constructor 
> (or all three)?
> 
> -- 
> -Richard M. Hartman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
>  

Reply via email to