"Jun-Kiat Lam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:2335@palm-dev-forum... > After a small spirited discussion, it looks like it is not a bug after > all. Given an expression like: > > return x + (signed long) (y - z) * 10; > > ANSI 6.3.3: > > "Except as indicated by the syntax or otherwise specified later (for the > function-call operator (), &&, ||, ?: and comma operators) the order of > evaluation of subexpressions and the order in which side effects take > place are both unspecified" You've lost me ... what has order of evaluation of subexpressions got to do with it? Stephen Best Bitware Australia -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palm.com/devzone/mailinglists.html
- CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jun-Kiat Lam
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Shankar Unni
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Marshall Clow
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Marshall Clow
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jun-Kiat Lam
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Fitzpatrick, Joe
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jim Schram
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jim Schram
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Richard Hartman
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Fitzpatrick, Joe
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Fitzpatrick, Joe
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
