"Jim Schram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:2371@palm-dev-forum... > It means mixing signed and unsigned arithmetic is just a really bad idea! And you never do this? .... :-). > None of this violates any casting or integer conversion rules; it's a > silent sign promotion problem during expression evaluation. Ain't broke. > Nothin' to fix. At the risk of boring others that have real work to do, where's the "silent" conversion in: result = x + (unsigned long) ((signed long) ((signed long) (y - z) * 10)); which also gives the same result? Stephen Best Bitware Australia -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palm.com/devzone/mailinglists.html
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Shankar Unni
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Marshall Clow
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Marshall Clow
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jun-Kiat Lam
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Fitzpatrick, Joe
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jim Schram
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jim Schram
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Richard Hartman
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Fitzpatrick, Joe
- RE: CW6 optimizer bug? Fitzpatrick, Joe
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Nathan J. Williams
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Jim Schram
- Re: CW6 optimizer bug? Stephen Best
