From: Fergal Moran
I would agree that C++ builder is a superior compiler to VC
However - I would much rather use VC for conduit development than use CW
Stringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 14/03/2000 12:40:29
Please respond to "Palm Developer Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Palm Developer Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Fergal Moran/962264/Ireland/Europe/EKC)
Subject: Favorite non-MS compiler????
My favorite non-MS compiler is Borland's C++ Builder.
I was able to write a complex, high performance conduit
with it. And the code is superior to that of VC++.
But due to the (unnecessary) inclusion of some minor VC++
classes in some of the CDK structures, I also had to write
a stub DLL in VC++ just to handle them. These classes
seem to be what stops one from using the Metrowerks
Window version of CodeWarrier to write conduits!
Roger Stringer
Marietta Systems, Inc
---------------------------------------------------------------
>Subject: Re: CDK v.3.0
>From: "Will Chapman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 20:21:42 -0000
>"Dave Lippincott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:4753@palm-dev-forum...
>>
>> Thats why I'm going to start using the Generic Conduit. Now I should be
>> able to use my favorite non-MS compiler ;-)
>>
>...and which one is that?
>
>Just curious..
>
>Will
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
please see http://www.palm.com/devzone/mailinglists.html
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palm.com/devzone/mailinglists.html
